ADA Accessibility Information
Accessibility
A
A
A

The zygomatic angle


Zygomatic ImplantWhen grafting is not an option, consider the advantages of implant anchorage in the zygoma.

Patients with chronic periodontal disease (a.k.a. “terminal dentition patients”) are often advised to remove their remaining teeth in order to improve their oral and overall health, but time after time, they do not follow this recommendation. One might ask, “How can this information be so plain to see, yet at the same time so hard to convey?”

I think the answer to the question posed above is obvious. The idea of losing all one’s teeth is devastating to most people. Even more objectionable is the idea of wearing a denture.

If this is true, we as dental professionals have an obligation to formulate and execute treatment plans that address the social, psychological, cosmetic—as well as the biologic—needs of this patient group.

Implant dentistry is the best option for existing edentulous patients or for patients with terminal dentition for one major reason: Implant-supported prostheses internally load the edentulous alveolus and therefore maintain the residual volume of the alveolar bone.

But what about the maxilla?



Treatment planning for a fixed, implant- supported prostheses is restricted by unique anatomical limitations in the maxilla.

The pneumatization of the maxillary sinuses bilaterally does not readily allow for the placement of implants in the posterior maxilla for the fabrication of implant-supported prostheses. Therefore, implants are usually placed in the os incisivum (Zone I), between the cuspid teeth. The placement of the implants in the os incisivum does not allow for adequate AP (anterior-posterior) distribution of the implants, and results in the fabrication of a tissue-supported implant overdenture that does not internally load the residual bone.

To physiologically load the residual alveolar bone with biomechanically stable implant-supported prostheses, grafting techniques such as the sinus lift procedure are often proposed. Although sinus grafting is a stable and predictable procedure, the multiple surgical interventions needed, as well as the inability to immediately load the implants, limit the number of patients who choose to proceed with this treatment option.

Zygomatic advantages



To address this objection, the use of zygomatic implants in the posterior maxilla in conjunction with two to four premaxillary implants has solved the various issues associated with establishing a predictable posterior support for implant-supported prostheses.

The use of zygomatic implants has many advantages over grafting the posterior maxilla; this surgical protocol allows for a graftless approach, a single surgical procedure and immediate loading. These advantages result in an increased rate of patient acceptance of the proposed treatment.

The zygomatic implant protocol addresses the needs of patients who are missing residual alveolar bone in their premolar and molar regions; lack of bone in Zone II (the premolar region) and Zone III (the molar region), respectively. These groups of patients are sometimes referred to as having moderate to advanced resorbed maxillae.

The use of the zygomatic implant also addresses the “extremely” resorbed maxilla, patients lacking bone in Zones I, II and III; otherwise known as the “untreatable” maxilla. By placement of four zygomatic implants, even this group of patients can be treated with fixed implant-supported prostheses.

The zygomatic implant is sometimes called the “Rescue Implant.” Many patients have had multiple grafting procedures to establish adequate boney volume for the placement of conventional implants. For various reasons, however, such as resorption of the bone graft or infection of the grafted bone, the residual boney volume remains inadequate for the placement of implants. The Brånemark System Zygoma implant addresses the needs of this group, too. The zygomatic concept encompasses procedures that complete the implant surgeon’s repertoire of surgical skills in treatment of the edentulous maxilla.

PEDRO F. FRANCO, DDS
HOWARD B. PRICE, DDS

REFER A FRIEND
IRVING LOCATION
2727 NORTH O'CONNOR RD
IRVING, TEXAS 75062

(469) 995-7808

REQUEST AN
APPOINTMENT IRVING



MESQUITE LOCATION
2540 N. GALLOWAY AVENUE
SUITE 303, BUILDING 3
MESQUITE, TX 75150

(972) 954-2116

REQUEST AN
APPOINTMENT MESQUITE



ENNIS LOCATION
2200 W. ENNIS BLVD, SUITE B
ENNIS, TX 75119

(469) 551-3211

REQUEST AN
APPOINTMENT ENNIS
Copyright © 2016-2017 Bite Lock and WEO MEDIA. All rights reserved.  Sitemap | Links